Privacy, on your terms.Analytics run by default. Decline any time.
Ontario education · Evidence review
A leaked script. A public record.
On August 17, 2026, The Trillium reported on a draft education advertising script dated July 10, 2026. This article checks the reported talking points against contracts, independent oversight records and Ontario’s current education data.
The reported teacher-pay line is not treated as proven or disproven here. A valid comparison would require current, like-for-like interprovincial compensation evidence.
The Trillium reported a leaked draft dated July 10, 2026 that uses actors playing parents to deliver government talking points about teacher pay, sick leave and possible job action.
Ontario’s Auditor General reports $111.9M in government advertising in 2024-25, the highest annual amount it has recorded. Nine campaigns totalling $43M, about 38%, were flagged as “Other Matters.”
The reported teacher-pay line is not treated as proven or disproven here. A valid comparison would require current, like-for-like interprovincial compensation evidence.
ETFO describes 11 paid sick days at 100% salary plus 120 short-term leave and disability plan days at 90%; medical-documentation rules depend on the agreement and circumstances.
Separate system records show real per-student operating funding at $14,504 in 2024-25, 71,263 OAP registrants waiting for core clinical funding, and major documented gaps in special education. Those facts are context, not proof of anyone’s motive.
01 · The document
Start with what was actually reported
Before arguing with a draft, separate the existence of the document from the truth of the claims inside it.
Reported draft
Ministry of Education: Student Achievement First
July 10, 2026
date on leaked draft
01
Teacher pay
Ontario teachers are already the highest paid in Canada.
02
Sick leave
Teachers average 14 sick days and can take them without supplying a medical note.
03
Campaign framing
Student Achievement First.
02 · Claim versus record
The ad says. The record says.
Each comparison answers the same factual question. Where the available evidence cannot answer it, we say that instead of reaching for a more dramatic number.
Reported claim
Ontario teachers are already the highest paid in Canada.
Reported in the leaked draft script.
The record
Not independently established here
The leaked draft presents this as a government talking point. This article does not use unrelated per-student funding data as a rebuttal. A valid answer would require a like-for-like, current interprovincial compensation comparison, which is not established by the sources used for this article.
Comparison rule: a system-funding statistic is context, not proof about a teacher-pay claim. We do not substitute one question for the other.
Reported claim
Teachers average 14 sick days and can take them without supplying a medical note.
Reported in the leaked draft script.
The record
What the leave framework says
ETFO describes 11 sick days at 100% salary and 120 short-term leave and disability plan days at 90%. Medical documentation is not accurately reduced to “no note”: ETFO says collective agreements set conditions for when documentation may be requested, and a board may also request it where there is a reasonable basis to challenge an absence or return.
Reported claim
Student Achievement First.
Reported in the leaked draft script.
The record
What the system record shows
The slogan is a government framing, not a measurable proposition by itself. The article therefore places it beside independently sourced records on special education, per-student funding and the OAP waitlist as context, without treating those records as proof of government intent.
03 · Follow the money
Government advertising reached a record high
The cleanest comparison is the government’s own advertising record, measured by the office that reviews it.
The Office of the Auditor General of Ontario reports that total government advertising spending reached $111.9M in 2024-25, up from $103.5M the year before. It calls the latest amount the highest it has recorded.
That does not mean the Auditor General labelled the entire amount partisan. The Office flagged nine campaigns totalling $43M, about 38% of total spending, as “Other Matters”: campaigns it says would not have passed the original review standard.
The same report explains why that distinction matters. Changes made in 2015 narrowed the statutory definition of “partisan” and removed the Auditor General’s discretion in determining an ad’s status. Under the amended rules, the Office says it cannot use factual accuracy, context or tone as additional tests of whether an advertisement is partisan.
2024/25 “Other Matters”
The Auditor General flagged nine campaigns totalling $43M, about 38% of the $111.9M total. The remaining spending is not labelled partisan by this chart.
Ontario government advertising spending, 2022-23 to 2024-25
Fiscal year
Total advertising spend
Other Matters flagged by Auditor General
2022-23
$33.7 million
Not shown for this article
2023-24
$103.5 million
Not shown for this article
2024-25
$111.9 million
$43 million (38%)
Source: Office of the Auditor General of Ontario, Review of Government Advertising, Annual Report 2025. “Other Matters” is the Auditor General’s term for campaigns the Office says would not have passed the original pre-2015 review standard.
04 · The school funding record
A separate question: what happened to per-student funding?
This chart does not answer whether teachers are the highest paid in Canada. It answers a different, important question about the system around them.
The Financial Accountability Office reports that real provincial operating funding per student was $14,504 in 2024-25, the lowest level in its ten-year historical series. The FAO then projects funding through 2027-28; the projected portion is shown separately because a forecast is not an observed outcome.
Real per-student provincial operating funding to Ontario school boards, 2024-25 constant dollars. Source: Financial Accountability Office of Ontario.
School year
Real funding per student
Actual or projected
2015-16
$14,862
Actual
2016-17
$15,132
Actual
2017-18
$14,776
Actual
2018-19
$14,923
Actual
2019-20
$14,539
Actual
2020-21
$15,296
Actual
2021-22
$14,640
Actual
2022-23
$14,620
Actual
2023-24
$14,866
Actual
2024-25
$14,504
Actual
2025-26
$14,521
Projected
2026-27
$14,685
Projected
2027-28
$14,111
Projected
Real provincial operating funding per student, 2024-25 constant dollars. Solid line is reported; dashed is the FAO’s projection. Source: Financial Accountability Office of Ontario, Ministry of Education: 2025 Spending Plan Review, October 23, 2025.
Financial Accountability Office of Ontario · 2025-10-23
Read this as system context, not as a rebuttal to the draft’s teacher-compensation talking point. Different propositions require different evidence.
05 · Student Achievement First
Which students?
Three current records that belong in any serious discussion about student achievement. None of them proves what the government intended by the ad campaign.
71,263
OAP registrants waiting for core clinical funding
91,974 children and youth are registered. 20,711 have an active core funding agreement, leaving 71,263 waiting for funding as of May 13, 2026.
This OAP figure is a disability-services record, not a school-board funding measure. It is included because the ad’s student-first framing invites the broader question of which disabled children are receiving public supports.
MCCSS FOI via OAC · May 2026 · May 13, 2026
$397.9M
spent above Ministry special-education funding
46 of 72 Ontario boards collectively spent more on special education than the Ministry provided in 2023/24.
The site-wide rounded display is $398M; the audit’s underlying total is $397.9M.
At each of the three sampled boards, the Auditor General found at least nine in ten annual IEP learning goals had no measurable criteria.
49-72% is the separate range for unfilled EA absences. The two findings are not interchangeable.
Auditor General of Ontario · Finding 4.3.1 · 2026-05-12
06 · Chronology
Bargaining, the scope dispute, then the reported draft
Timing matters. Timing alone does not prove a plan, a motive or a causal chain.
verified event
Unions jointly call for early bargaining
AEFO, ETFO, OECTA, OSBCU and OSSTF publicly ask the government to start bargaining early, citing the risk of a September disruption. The unions say the call was not taken up.
verified event
Five unions serve notice to bargain
AEFO, ETFO, OECTA, OSBCU and OSSTF/FEESO each serve notice to bargain, together representing more than 255,000 teachers and education workers. The parties must meet within 15 days.
reported draft
Date on the reported draft
The leaked education advertising script reported by The Trillium is dated July 10 and labelled “Ministry of Education: Student Achievement First.”
party position
OSBCU refers scope dispute to the Labour Board
After four days at the central table, OSBCU rejects a Ministry proposal to centralize historically local items and refers the scope question to the Ontario Labour Relations Board. OSBCU says the dispute could delay bargaining by several months.
party position
OSBCU files a formal scope application with the Labour Board
OSBCU files its application asking the Ontario Labour Relations Board to determine which issues belong within the scope of central bargaining, and writes to the Crown and the employers’ bargaining agency asking that bargaining proceed meanwhile on the items both sides already agree are central. OSBCU says it cannot say how long the Board will take.
reported draft
The Trillium reports the script
The Trillium publishes its report on the leaked draft and the Education Minister’s response. Publication of the report establishes the reporting date, not whether every proposed spot was filmed or aired unchanged.
Sequence shows timing. It does not, by itself, establish motive or causation.
Sources: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario · 2026-06-03 · The Trillium · 2026-08-17
Current bargaining status: September 28, 2026 review: all five central unions have now scheduled member strike votes — ETFO (roughly 84,000 members) electronically November 9–18, 2026, CUPE-OSBCU (57,000 members) electronically November 4–18, 2026, OSSTF/FEESO electronically November 6–16, 2026, OECTA November 12–13, 2026, and AEFO electronically November 16–17, 2026. These are separate scheduled votes, not strike dates or completed results. OSBCU reports OLRB scope-hearing dates of October 6, 21, 27 and 28 and expects a decision in early November; those hearings have not yet begun. The reviewed material does not establish a strike start date or that statutory preconditions for job action have been met. Check the source date, your bargaining unit and board notices; this tracker is not a census of every central or local table.
07 · Government position
What the government says
Responsible communication means giving the government’s explanation its own space, not burying it inside a rebuttal.
According to The Trillium, Education Minister Paul Calandra confirmed the government intended to communicate directly with parents and pointed to union advertising as part of the reason for doing so. The reported draft frames the campaign around student achievement, teacher attendance and curriculum priorities.
That is the government’s stated rationale. It does not establish that every numerical talking point in a proposed advertisement is accurate, just as disagreement with the campaign does not establish an undisclosed motive.
The bargaining dispute is also contested. The public record contains competing accounts about why talks slowed and which issues belong at the central table. The Ontario Labour Relations Board process is the appropriate place to resolve the scope question; this article does not convert either side’s account into an independent finding.
08 · Evidence synthesis
What the record establishes, and what it does not
A strong case gets stronger when the unknowns are visible.
Reported claim
A July 10 draft exists in the reporting
The Trillium reported the draft and its talking points on August 17. Those talking points remain claims unless supported independently.
Verified record
The oversight and funding records are measurable
The Auditor General, FAO, collective-agreement guidance and current program data establish the spending, funding and special-education facts presented above.
What remains unknown
Draft is not the same as final campaign
We do not know from the cited record whether every proposed spot was filmed, whether a final campaign aired word-for-word, its final total cost, or the government’s private strategy or motive.
09 · Method
How we checked this
The rule is simple: classify the evidence before drawing the conclusion.
We treat a leaked-script line as a reported claim, a minister’s explanation as a government position, an Auditor General or FAO finding as a verified record, and any conclusion we draw from those facts as analysis.
We also apply a comparison-integrity rule: the evidence beside a claim must answer the same factual proposition. That is why the teacher-pay line is not “debunked” with a per-student funding number. The funding series is important, but it answers a different question.
If the final advertising campaign, bargaining status or source record changes, this article should change with it. The evidence module for this page was last reviewed 2026-08-17.
Citable facts from this page(2)
What did the 2026 Ontario Auditor General find about special education?
Tabled May 12, 2026, the Auditor General's Special Report on Special Education Needs found 65% of placement decisions had no written rationale, 90%+ of IEP goals lacked measurable criteria, education assistants absent on 18% of school days (49-72% unfilled), and only 21% of inclusive-classroom teachers could meet most students' needs. It made 15 recommendations; the Ministry disagreed with 2.
Source: Auditor General of Ontario, Special Report on Special Education Needs (May 12, 2026) · Open source record
What did the Auditor General find about Ontario autism services?
The Ontario Auditor General (2013, follow-up 2015) found: inadequate wait time tracking, insufficient oversight of therapy providers, and families waiting years without updates. The FAO (2020, 2024) found the program chronically underfunded. Most accountability recommendations remain unimplemented.
Source: Ontario Auditor General 2013; FAO Reports 2020, 2024 · Open source record
Frequently asked questions
The reported teacher-pay line is not treated as proven or disproven here. A valid comparison would require current, like-for-like interprovincial compensation evidence.
Where the waitlist stands
Families navigating autism services in Ontario face a documented multi-year wait. Here is the Ontario data — and a two-minute way to push back, when you are ready.
MCCSS figures obtained under Freedom of Information by the Ontario Autism Coalition
Government source
Related guides
Guides and tools related to this page.
Sources on this page
The source chain stays visible.
Key claims are paired with their source, evidence tier, and verification date so readers can inspect the public record directly.
Facts1
Sources1
Under the Ontario Education Act, every student with special needs is entitled to an Individual Education Plan (IEP) and access to an Identification, Placement and Review Committee (IPRC)