Most families worry about admission. Admission is a single conversation, and if it goes badly you find out immediately and keep looking.
That does not mean admission is unprotected. As the table above sets out, refusing a child because of their disability may itself be discrimination in the provision of a service, and is actionable.
But the harder problem is the exit. A private-school placement rests on a tuition contract, and a contract may provide for ending the placement. A private school does not use the public-board IPRC placement appeal route, though the Human Rights Code still applies and the contract may also give you rights. Another private school is not automatically required to take your child instead. If your child returns to the home board, ask how it will assess and support them during the transition.
That is the difference worth understanding: a public board’s identification and placement decisions follow a defined process with an appeal route. Private-school placement decisions do not use that route, though contract and human-rights remedies may apply.
This is also why a funding entitlement, if Ontario ever created one, would not by itself help. Money that follows a child to a school which need not admit them, need not keep them, and need not write a plan for them is not a placement. It is a subsidy. We looked into who is proposing that, and what we found →
For context on scale: of roughly 1,445 independent schools in Ontario, 57 emphasize special education, about 3.9% of the sector, on the count published by an organization that supports funding them. Some of those 57 schools are excellent, and this page is not an argument against them. It is an argument about what a family can enforce.
Naturally Diverse report on Ontario independent schools · Composition as of July 2022 | Updated 2026-10-23