AAC vs PECS: What's the Difference? Picture Cards vs Communication Devices

Direct answer

AAC vs PECS is not a contest between equals. AAC (augmentative and alternative communication) is the broad group. PECS is one low-tech AAC method that uses picture cards. A speech-generating device or app is another, and it speaks aloud. Ontario's ADP can help eligible residents pay for approved devices. A speech-language pathologist can help match the tool to your child.

Page updated · Sources

The numbers behind the answer

PECS Evidence
Promising, not yet established
Flippin et al., 2010
ADP Share (Communication Aids)
75% of the ADP price
Ontario ADP, updated February 18, 2026

AAC vs PECS: what's the difference?

PECS vs AAC is a question that mixes two levels. AAC is the whole group of ways to communicate without speech or alongside it. PECS, the Picture Exchange Communication System, is one method inside that group. So the useful question is usually which tool, or which mix of tools, fits your child right now.

With PECS, a child hands a picture card to a partner to ask for something. With a speech-generating device or app, a child touches symbols or words on a screen and the device says them aloud. PECS has no voice output and needs a partner who is close by. A device can hold far more words, but it needs charging, setup, and a partner who learns to use it too.

Neither tool is better for every child. Some children use both, or use one at home and the other at school.

What does AAC stand for? Is PECS a type of AAC?

AAC stands for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative means adding to the speech a child has. Alternative means replacing speech when it is not enough. AAC can be unaided, such as gestures and signs, or aided, such as picture cards, boards, and devices.

Yes, PECS is a type of AAC. Pyramid Educational Consultants, which publishes PECS, describes it as an alternative and augmentative communication system with six phases. It starts with a child giving one picture of a wanted item to a partner. Later phases teach sentences, answering questions, and commenting.

PECS vs AAC device: side by side

This table compares PECS with a tablet app or speech-generating device, because those are the two choices parents most often weigh. Other AAC, such as signs or a core board, can sit beside either one.

AAC vs PECS side by side: how PECS picture cards and an AAC tablet app or speech-generating device differ.
What to comparePECS (picture cards)AAC tablet app or speech-generating device
How the child communicatesThe main actionHands a picture card to a partnerTouches symbols or words on a screen
Voice outputDoes it speak?No. The partner reads the card and respondsYes. The device or app says the message aloud
Room for wordsHow the vocabulary growsGrows by adding cards, within what a book can holdCan hold many more words, and can be set up for the child
What a partner must doWho else is involvedBe close by and respond to each cardLearn the layout and show the child how to use it
Learning pathHow a child moves forwardSix set phases, from one card to sentences and commentsSet up and adjusted by the speech-language pathologist
Carrying and durabilityDay-to-day useNo battery. Cards and a book are easy to carryNeeds charging, a case, and care. Some people use a mount
Who sets it upThe professional involvedA speech-language pathologist, teacher, or team trained in PECSA speech-language pathologist with AAC training, plus the seller for setup
Paying for it in OntarioFunding route, not an amountMaterials are low cost. Ask your school team or clinic what they supplyADP may help with approved devices. OAP lists augmentative communication devices as eligible expenses for childhood budgets and interim funding

Low-tech vs high-tech AAC

Low-tech AAC needs no battery. Cards, boards, and books are low-tech. High-tech AAC uses electronics and speaks aloud. Mid-tech sits between them, such as a simple button that plays one recorded message.

Low-tech tends to fit when a child is just starting to link pictures with wants, when a backup is needed, or when a device would be at risk, such as at a pool or a park. High-tech tends to fit when a child is ready for many words, needs a voice that others understand, or has a team ready to model the words on the device. These are tendencies, not rules.

PECS board and core board (low-tech AAC)

A PECS book holds picture cards that the child hands to a partner. A core board is a fixed page of common words, such as go, more, and stop, that a child points to. Both need no battery and are easy to carry. Neither speaks aloud.

High-tech AAC: apps and speech-generating devices

A tablet app or dedicated device shows symbols or letters and speaks them aloud. Apps named on this site include Proloquo2Go, TouchChat, and LAMP Words for Life. Dedicated devices come from makers such as Tobii Dynavox and PRC-Saltillo. We do not rank or endorse products.

PECS or AAC device: how to choose for your child

No single age, test score, or symbol count decides this. An AAC-trained speech-language pathologist looks at the whole picture. These five questions can help you prepare for that talk.

Five questions to bring to an AAC assessment

  1. Can my child reach, point, or press?

    Touching a card or a screen takes hand control. If reaching is hard, ask about other ways to use a device.

  2. Does my child connect pictures to real things?

    A child who is just learning that a picture can get a wanted item may start well with cards.

  3. Is my child starting to combine ideas?

    A child who is ready for longer messages may need more words than a card book can hold.

  4. Where will it be used?

    Think about home, school, outdoors, and car rides. Ask how the tool will be charged, carried, and kept safe.

  5. Who will show my child how to use it?

    Parents, teachers, and educational assistants all need practice. Ask who will teach them and how often.

Can a child use PECS and an AAC device together?

Yes. AAC is a group of tools, so a child can use more than one. A child might use picture cards at snack time and a device at school, or keep cards as a backup when a battery runs out.

Using several tools together is sometimes called multimodal AAC. Ask the speech-language pathologist how the tools will fit together, so your child is not learning two separate systems with no link between them.

Will AAC or PECS stop my child from speaking?

No evidence shows that AAC stops speech. A 2006 research review by Millar, Light, and Schlosser found 23 studies. In the six with enough rigour (27 cases), none showed a drop in speech after AAC, 11% showed no change, and 89% showed gains, which were mostly modest. Most of those participants were taught manual signs or non-electronic aided systems, and the authors said more research is needed.

For PECS on its own, a 2010 meta-analysis by Flippin and colleagues found small to moderate gains in communication and called PECS promising but not yet established as an evidence-based approach. Gains in speech were small to negative. That means PECS has not been shown to build speech, so ask how speech goals will be tracked whichever tool you choose.

Who pays for AAC in Ontario?

This is a short summary. Check each program’s own page before you buy anything, because rules and amounts can change.

ADP, the Assistive Devices Program, helps cover approved communication aids, including speech-generating devices. On its Communication Aids page (updated February 18, 2026), ADP lists who qualifies. The list includes being an Ontario resident with a valid health card, being unable to speak or having speech that is very hard to understand, and being unable to use a pen and paper to write because of a physical disability. Income is not considered. Not every autistic child will meet these conditions, so ask an ADP-registered clinician.

ADP pays 75% of the ADP price and you pay the rest (25%). ADP says people who receive Ontario Works, the Ontario Disability Support Program, or Assistance for Children with Severe Disabilities can get 100% coverage. ADP also warns that if you order a device before its application steps are finished, you pay the full cost.

Ontario’s list of eligible expenses for OAP childhood budgets and interim one-time funding (updated March 10, 2026) names augmentative communication devices, a touch-screen tablet and software, and speech and language therapy, which can include assessments and consultations. That page covers those two kinds of funding only, and it does not name AAC training. Ask OAP what applies to your child.

School boards may be able to provide equipment for school use. Ask your school team, in writing, what they can provide and whether it can go home. Private insurance and charities may also cover some costs, so ask them first.

An active Core Funding Agreement does not mean a child is receiving services.

You can start AAC before OAP core funding starts

You do not need an OAP funding invitation to begin. Low-tech tools such as picture cards or a communication board can start now. A private speech-language assessment can also start now, and the family pays for it. Reported wait context: 5+ years for families registered in August 2021 (community-reported, Ontario Autism Coalition, July 2026). Ontario publishes no regional wait times.

Why Timing Matters

A wait spans childhood.

Early support can help autistic children develop skills. Age six is not a clinical cutoff, and support can be beneficial at any age. Illustrative arithmetic only: registration at age three plus a five-year wait reaches age eight. Age six is a reference marker, not a clinical cutoff. This is not a prediction of funding, service access or developmental outcomes.

Illustrative example · not a population estimate

Example: an illustrative child's journey through the Ontario Autism Program

An assumed five-year wait from registration at age 3 reaches age 8. This is an example, not a typical or predicted service date.

Illustrative age referenceAge six is not a clinical cutoff
Example childRegistered at 3, example wait ends at 8
5 years waiting
Age 6
Past age 6at the end of this illustrative wait
Registeredage 3
Example wait endsage 8
012345678
Child's age (years)
Example: age reference and assumed wait
MeasureAge range
Illustrative age referenceBirth to age 6
Example wait using the OAC-reported minimum (registered age 3)Age 3 to age 8 (5 years)
Age at the end of this illustrative waitPast age 6

Toddler treatment study

Dawson et al. (2010) randomly assigned 48 autistic toddlers aged 18–30 months to the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) or community intervention for two years. The ESDM group had greater improvements in cognitive and adaptive outcomes. This study compared treatments for toddlers; it did not compare intervention before versus after age six or establish a universal multiplier for gains.

Support across ages

NIH notes that treatment can help at any age. Support should reflect the person’s needs; a wait does not determine an individual child’s future outcomes.

Ontario does not publish an age-at-registration breakdown for registrations without an active Core Funding Agreement. This example does not describe the age distribution of that group.

SourceDawson et al. (2010) · NIH: autism and support across ages. The illustrative wait uses the community report: 5+ years for families registered in August 2021 (community-reported, Ontario Autism Coalition, July 2026). This is not a provincial average.

Frequently asked questions

AAC is the broad group of ways to communicate without speech or alongside it. PECS is one low-tech AAC method where a child hands over picture cards. A speech-generating device or app is another AAC method, and it speaks aloud. So PECS is a kind of AAC, not a rival to it.

Neither is better for every child. PECS often suits a child who is starting to link pictures with wants. A device often suits a child who is ready for many words and needs a voice others understand. An AAC-trained speech-language pathologist can weigh reach, language, settings, and partners.

There is no set age or symbol count. Ask an AAC-trained speech-language pathologist to review the move when a child outgrows the card book, starts combining ideas, or needs a voice others can hear. Some families keep picture cards as a backup after adding a device.

No. A core board is a fixed page of common words that a child points to. With PECS, a child hands a picture card to a partner, in six phases. Both are low-tech AAC and neither speaks aloud. A speech-language pathologist can say which fits, or whether to use both.

No evidence shows that it does. A 2006 research review found no drop in speech after AAC in the studies with enough rigour, and most cases gained some speech. For PECS alone, a 2010 meta-analysis found speech gains were small to negative, so ask how speech goals will be tracked.

It can, depending on the program and the device. ADP helps eligible residents with approved communication aids and pays 75% of the ADP price. Ontario’s OAP expense list for childhood budgets and interim one-time funding names augmentative communication devices. Confirm with each program before you buy.

Usually the device costs more, because it adds hardware or software, mounts, and setup. PECS needs cards and a book. We do not print prices because they change and differ by product. ADP sets the price a registered business can charge for approved aids. Our Ontario AAC guide explains what drives the cost.

Yes. Low-tech AAC, such as picture cards or a communication board, does not need a funding invitation. A private speech-language assessment can also start now, and the family pays for it. Ask your school team what it can provide, and check ADP if a device is recommended.

Sources

  1. ADP

    Ontario Ministry of Health, Communication aids (updated February 18, 2026; read October 13, 2026)

    Checked

  2. MCCSS

    Ontario Autism Program: eligible and ineligible expenses for childhood budgets and interim one-time funding (updated March 10, 2026; read October 13, 2026)

    Checked

  3. Pyramid Educational Consultants

    What is PECS? The six phases of PECS (read October 13, 2026)

    Checked

  4. Research

    Flippin et al. (2010), "Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis," American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(2), 178-195

    Checked

  5. Research

    Millar, Light & Schlosser (2006), "The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review," Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 248-264

    Checked

  6. Research

    Frolli et al. (2022), "AAC and Autism: Manual Signs and Pecs, a Comparison," Behavioral Sciences, 12(10), 359 (further reading)

    Checked

Next steps

Keep going with related guidance, tools, and evidence.

About this page

Check the author’s context, review method, and how to report an error.

Written by

Founder & Autism Advocate

Lived experience: Parent of autistic child navigating OAP system

Get the next FOI release before the news cycle does.