Media Reference
Media & Data StandardsThe science demands action
67,509 children are waiting past the evidence-based intervention window — every month of delay has measurable consequences.
Registered
88,175Children registered
Total in the Ontario Autism Program queue
CBC FOI Jan 2026
Funded
20,666Have active funding
Just 23.4% of registered children
CBC FOI Jan 2026
Waiting
67,509Still waiting
Registered. Diagnosed. Un-funded.
CBC FOI Jan 2026
Verified — CBC FOI Jan 2026
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Children registered | 88,175 |
| Have active funding | 20,666 |
| Still waiting | 67,509 |
On October 29, 2025, a clip of Spencer Carroll was included in a reel published by WHO's official Instagram account (@who) discussing autism early intervention. who The specific editorial process for WHO social media posts is not publicly documented.
End The Wait Ontario uses exclusively FOI-sourced government data foi, Financial Accountability Office (FAO) reports, Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services (MCCSS) published statistics, and peer-reviewed research. Every number on this site includes source, date, and FOI reference number where applicable. gov
Our methodology independently follows principles common to rigorous health data practice: verification against primary sources, cross-referencing between independent datasets, and transparent documentation of methods. Independent verification is built into every data point we publish.
ETWO publishes source citations for every data point. Readers can verify any number against the original government document. gov MCCSS public communications about the OAP do not routinely include primary-source citations or methodology notes.
For reference: international and federal standards relevant to autism services. These are public standards — listing them here does not imply ETWO has any formal relationship with these bodies.
When powerful institutions face data-driven accountability from community organizations, a common institutional response is to question the organization's size rather than the evidence itself. This is a documented pattern in health policy advocacy worldwide.
Miranda Fricker's framework on epistemic injustice (Oxford University Press, 2007) describes how credibility is deflated based on identity characteristics rather than evidence quality. WHO's Civil Society Commission (launched August 2023) was created specifically to strengthen engagement with grassroots and community organizations — WHO itself recognized this institutional bias.
Quick-Reference Credibility Verification
HRTO Case Disclaimer
The legal claims in Carroll v. Ontario (HRTO 2025-62264-I) involve specific individual circumstances and are distinct from the general advocacy positions expressed on this website. This case alleges that wait times during documented critical developmental windows may constitute discrimination under Ontario's Human Rights Code.
Educational reference on how WHO engages civil society organizations. This is general information, not about ETWO.
Read more: How WHO Evaluates Civil Society (General Info)How ETWO independently applies rigorous data quality practices. FOI-sourced, cross-verified, auditable.
Read more: Our Data StandardsWhy the messenger's size does not determine the message's accuracy.
Read more: Small Organizations, Outsized ImpactCommitment to Accuracy: Our data is verified against official government reports (FAO, MCCSS), peer-reviewed scientific literature, and accessible public records. Last updated: March 24, 2026.
Related Resources
Verified Facts
WHO recommends accessible, community-based early interventions for children with autism — timely evidence-based psychosocial interventions improve communication and social engagement
88,175 — children are registered in the Ontario Autism Program
23.4% — Only 20,666 children have active funding agreements () — less than one in four
Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) delivered to children aged 18–30 months produced significant gains in IQ, adaptive behaviour, and autism severity — some children no longer met diagnostic criteria at follow-up
Cochrane systematic review finds evidence that early intensive behavioural intervention (EIBI) may produce positive effects on adaptive behaviour and communication for young children with ASD (low certainty of evidence)