Skip to main content
end|thewaitontario
HomeStart HereSee the DataPolicy & RightsResourcesYour RegionEducationNewsroomAbout
Get Started
Start Here
Budget 2026: $965M budgeted, 67,509 children still waiting. Read our analysis →

New here? Start with our 2-minute guide to OAP registration — no sign-up required.

Preparing content
end|thewaitontario

Parent-led advocacy for Ontario families waiting for autism services.

Getting Started

  • Browse All Pages
  • Search
  • Diagnosis Guide
  • While You Wait
  • Facts (Citation Ready)

Common Questions

  • All Questions
  • How Long Is the Wait?
  • What Is the OAP?
  • How Many Are Waiting?
  • Options While Waiting
  • Funding Amounts

Tools

  • Next Steps Tool
  • Wait Estimator
  • Funding Estimator
  • Therapy Budget
  • Waitlist Tracker

Providers

  • Provider Directory
  • Choosing a Provider
  • Submit a Provider

Funding & Support

  • OAP Overview
  • Funding Guide
  • Eligibility
  • How to Register
  • DTC & RDSP

Your Region

  • Toronto
  • Ottawa
  • Hamilton
  • London
  • Mississauga
  • All Regions

Evidence & Data

  • Evidence Library
  • Data Hub
  • Waitlist Data
  • Cost Calculator
  • Data Stories
  • Where Does the Money Go?

Take Action

  • Action Hub
  • Write Your MPP
  • File Complaint
  • Advocacy Toolkit

About

  • Our Story
  • Transparency
  • Media References
  • Founder
  • Press
  • Contact
end|thewaitontario

Parent-led advocacy for Ontario families waiting for autism services.

Getting Started

  • Browse All Pages
  • Search
  • Diagnosis Guide
  • While You Wait
  • Facts (Citation Ready)

Common Questions

  • All Questions
  • How Long Is the Wait?
  • What Is the OAP?
  • How Many Are Waiting?
  • Options While Waiting
  • Funding Amounts

Tools

  • Next Steps Tool
  • Wait Estimator
  • Funding Estimator
  • Therapy Budget
  • Waitlist Tracker

Providers

  • Provider Directory
  • Choosing a Provider
  • Submit a Provider

Funding & Support

  • OAP Overview
  • Funding Guide
  • Eligibility
  • How to Register
  • DTC & RDSP

Your Region

  • Toronto
  • Ottawa
  • Hamilton
  • London
  • Mississauga
  • All Regions

Evidence & Data

  • Evidence Library
  • Data Hub
  • Waitlist Data
  • Cost Calculator
  • Data Stories
  • Where Does the Money Go?

Take Action

  • Action Hub
  • Write Your MPP
  • File Complaint
  • Advocacy Toolkit

About

  • Our Story
  • Transparency
  • Media References
  • Founder
  • Press
  • Contact
end|thewaitontario

Parent-led advocacy for Ontario families waiting for autism services.

  • Browse All Pages
  • Search
  • Diagnosis Guide
  • While You Wait
  • Facts (Citation Ready)
  • All Questions
  • How Long Is the Wait?
  • What Is the OAP?
  • How Many Are Waiting?
  • Options While Waiting
  • Funding Amounts
  • Next Steps Tool
  • Wait Estimator
  • Funding Estimator
  • Therapy Budget
  • Waitlist Tracker
  • Provider Directory
  • Choosing a Provider
  • Submit a Provider
  • OAP Overview
  • Funding Guide
  • Eligibility
  • How to Register
  • DTC & RDSP
  • Toronto
  • Ottawa
  • Hamilton
  • London
  • Mississauga
  • All Regions
  • Evidence Library
  • Data Hub
  • Waitlist Data
  • Cost Calculator
  • Data Stories
  • Where Does the Money Go?
  • Action Hub
  • Write Your MPP
  • File Complaint
  • Advocacy Toolkit
  • Our Story
  • Transparency
  • Media References
  • Founder
  • Press
  • Contact

Legal Disclaimer: This website presents advocacy arguments based on publicly available data and legal frameworks. While we strive for accuracy, this content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or medical advice. Nothing on this website should be construed as a guarantee of any specific legal outcome.

Independence: End The Wait Ontario is a parent-led advocacy group. We are not affiliated with the Ontario government, the Ontario Autism Coalition, Autism Ontario, or the World Health Organization. We cite FOI data obtained by the Ontario Autism Coalition as a matter of public record. This does not constitute affiliation. References to these organizations are for informational purposes; no endorsement is implied.

Non-partisan policy advocacy: We advocate on policy outcomes for children and families and do not endorse any political party or candidate.

Statistics are current as of the dates cited and may change. For specific legal guidance, consult a licensed attorney. For medical advice, consult qualified healthcare professionals. Last updated: 2026.

Legal|Privacy|Terms|Cookies|Accessibility|Corrections|Authority

Advocacy, not anger. Data, not speculation.

Carroll v. Ontario · HRTO 2025-62264-I

© 2026 End The Wait Ontario. All rights reserved. · Parent-led advocacy · Not a government agency

Preparing content
  1. Home
  2. ›Investigations
  3. ›Oversight Doesn’t Follow the Money

Spending & oversight · FAO · FIPPA · AG

When oversight doesn’t follow the money.

Ontario spent $691.2 million on autism services in 2023–24. Less than half reached core clinical therapy. The administrative architecture managing the rest is largely shielded from public audit. Structural barriers have left 67,509 children behind.

Reporter
Spencer Carroll
Published
April 2026
Read time
~16 min · 24 sources
Verified
2026-04-06
Total OAP spending, 2023–24
$691.2M

Total OAP spending, 2023–24

FAO · MCCSS via FOI

Reached core clinical therapy — the rest is architecture
44.5%

Reached core clinical therapy — the rest is architecture

Trillium FOI · 2024-07-04

To AccessOAP — the consortium-run intake apparatus
$57.9M

To AccessOAP — the consortium-run intake apparatus

FAO Spending Plan Review

Children still on the OAP waitlist
67,509

Children still on the OAP waitlist

CBC FOI · Jan 2026

“
My son was diagnosed at 14 months. We registered with the OAP before his second birthday. We did everything the system asked us to do, exactly when the system asked us to do it. We waited four and a half years. He received two rounds of caregiver coaching. He received zero core clinical services. He turned six last month. The critical intervention window — ages zero to six — is closed. It does not reopen.

Family impact · one documented case

Spencer Carroll · Founder, End The Wait Ontario

01 · The intervention window

75% of the critical window was spent waiting.

Early intervention for autism is most effective between the ages of zero and six. This is not a policy preference. It is a clinical reality established by decades of developmental neuroscience and endorsed by the World Health Organization. During this period, the brain’s neural pathways are at their most plastic. The same therapies delivered after this window produce measurably less impact.

In the documented case above, the child was diagnosed at 14 months. The family registered with the OAP in September 2021. The system acknowledged their existence. Then the system made them wait.

Development timeline against the WHO intervention window

WHO window vs. waitlist vs. services received.

WHO window
Ages 0–6
On waitlist
75% — zero core services
Services received
8%

WHO early-intervention guidelines · OAP registration Sept 2021 · 6th birthday March 2, 2026.

Every month a child spends waiting is a month of neural development that proceeds without the structured therapeutic support designed to shape it. For the 67,509 children still waiting, the window is closing now.

02 · What the waitlist actually costs a family

$175,439 in pre-tax income, to buy a fraction of what $153,000 in public funds would have delivered.

When the public system fails to deliver the services it promised, families face a choice: wait and watch the intervention window close, or pay privately — with after-tax income — for the therapeutic services the government committed to fund with public money.

This is not a discretionary government benefit. This is public money, appropriated by the Legislature, designated for children with autism. The funds do not belong to the government. They belong to the public. Families should not have to petition an externally operated intake apparatus for access to what is already theirs.

Yet that is precisely what happens. The government has inserted an intermediary — a privately operated consortium functioning as a needs-determination and claims-administration system — between the public funds and the children those funds exist to serve.

The financial cost · one family, 4.5 years

What was paid, what was earned, what would have cost less.

AmountDescriptionBeneficiaryStatus
~$100KPrivate therapy over 4.5 years — after-tax dollars paid out of pocket.Paid by familyOpen
~$175KPre-tax income required at ~43% combined Ontario marginal rate.Earned by familyOpen
~$153KWhat OAP core services would have cost the government ($34,000/yr FAO avg × 4.5 years).Public cost (not delivered)Reversed
$0Public spending on core clinical services for this child during the entire critical intervention window.DeliveredLocked

Scale

This is not an outlier. There are 67,509 children registered in the OAP without active core clinical services funding. For every family that can afford to pay privately, there are families that cannot. Those children receive nothing. The window closes anyway.

03 · Where $691.2M goes

Less than half reaches children as therapy.

$691.2M total

$307.3M44.5%

Core clinical services — therapy

44.5%

$100.3M14.5%

Legacy / childhood budgets · transitional

14.5%

$57.9M8.4%

AccessOAP administration

8.4%

$44.1M6.4%

Urgent response

6.4%

$36M5.2%

Foundational family services

5.2%

$26.5M3.8%

Capacity building

3.8%

$14.8M2.1%

Entry to school

2.1%

$104.3M15.1%

Connections + other

15.1%

MCCSS documents obtained by The Trillium through FOI · FAO Spending Plan Review.

The FAO estimated OAP spending of $691.2M in 2023–24. MCCSS documents obtained by The Trillium through FOI reveal how that money was allocated. Only $307.3M — 44.5% — reached core clinical therapy. The remaining $383.9M went to administrative architecture, pillar programs, and support structures.

“

Less than half reaches children as therapy. No published independent audit has examined how the rest is spent.

ETWO analysis · FAO Spending Plan Review · MCCSS via FOI

04 · The administrative architecture

The apparatus does not serve the child. It manages the consequences of not serving the child.

Look at the list of non-therapy line items above. Foundational Family Services. Capacity Building Initiatives. Entry to School. Connections for Students. Urgent Response. These programs exist for one reason: the government does not fully fund core clinical services.

When a child cannot access therapy, families need foundational supports to manage without it. When the system cannot deliver services, it needs capacity building to try to expand. When children wait years for therapy, they need urgent response programs to handle the crises that untreated autism produces. When children enter school without adequate intervention, they need connections programs to bridge the gap.

Every one of these programs is a secondary structure that would be unnecessary — or dramatically smaller — if the primary obligation were met: funding therapy for every diagnosed child.

The math of full funding vs. the current architecture

Reroute the architecture, fund 11,291 more children.

AmountDescriptionBeneficiaryStatus
~$3.00BFull funding requirement: 88,175 children × $34,000/yr (FAO average).RequiredOpen
$691.2MCurrent total OAP spending, 2023–24 (FAO Spending Plan Review).ActualOpen
$383.9MCurrent spending on non-therapy programs — architecture managing the consequences of underfunding.ReroutableIn progress
+11,291Additional children fundable at $34,000/yr if non-therapy spend were redirected.AchievableReversed

This is the structural inversion at the heart of the OAP. The government spends $383.9M per year on programs that exist because it will not spend enough on the one program that would make most of them unnecessary.

Compare this to any other model of public service delivery. When a Canadian breaks a leg, they go to the emergency room. A physician assesses the injury. Treatment begins. No one asks the patient to register with an intake consortium, wait for a needs-determination interview, receive a score, enter a queue, and then — years later — receive approval to access the cast that should have been applied on day one. The diagnosis is the entitlement. The treatment follows.

The Ontario Autism Program has inverted this. The diagnosis is the beginning of an administrative process. Every dollar spent administering that process is a dollar not spent on therapy. $57.9M went to AccessOAP — the consortium that handles registration, intake, needs determination, care coordination, and payment reconciliation. At the FAO’s average of $34,000 per child, that sum alone would fund therapeutic services for 1,703 children.

Structural observation

The functions AccessOAP performs — registration, intake, needs assessment, claims coordination, payment administration — are structurally identical to insurance claims administration. The difference is that insurance companies are regulated, audited, and subject to public reporting. AccessOAP, as a private consortium funded by public money, is not subject to public FIPPA requests, mandatory Auditor General audit cycles, or comparable public reporting requirements.

05 · Spending goes up. The waitlist goes up.

Both lines rise together — the paradox of structural inefficiency.

  1. 2019–20

    Spending ~$300M · 23,000 children registered

    Baseline year before OAP redesign.
  2. 2020–21

    Spending ~$390M · 40,000 children registered

    +30% spend, +74% registrations.
  3. 2021–22

    Spending ~$500M · 54,000 children registered

    AccessOAP partnership announced Dec 2021.
  4. 2022–23

    Spending ~$600M · 68,000 children registered

    +100% spend vs baseline, +196% registrations.
  5. 2023–24

    Spending $691M · 80,000 children registered

    44.5% reaches core clinical therapy.
  6. 2025–26Pivot

    Budget $965M · 88,175 children registered

    Described as a record investment. Waitlist still 67,509.

In any functioning system, more money should produce fewer children waiting. In the OAP, both lines go up together. Spending is up ~3.2× since 2019. Registrations are up ~3.8×. The 2026 funding level is the highest in the program’s history. The waitlist is the largest in the program’s history.

06 · 88,175 registered. 20,666 funded.

A sea of red. One funded segment.

23.4%
Funded · active CFA

20,666 children

76.6%
Waiting · no funding agreement

67,509 children

88,175 children registered. Visualizing the ratio at scale — the waitlist is over three times the funded population. MCCSS / AccessOAP · Dec 2025.

07 · The oversight gap

FIPPA applies to provincial institutions. AccessOAP is not a FIPPA institution.

DimensionMCCSS · ministry sideAccessOAP · contractor side
FIPPA accessFull — FIPPA-designated institution.Not covered — not a FIPPA institution.
AG special auditFull — statutory authority over MCCSS.Discretionary — Section 9.1 of the AG Act, only if AG chooses.
FAO data accessCan request ministry data.No statutory access to AccessOAP books.
$57.9M breakdownAggregate visible at the ministry layer via FOI.By consortium partner, by function, by line — not disclosed.

The AG can audit grant recipients under Section 9.1 of the Auditor General Act — discretionarily. The FAO has no authority over the contractor.

Government position

The government announced $965M for OAP in the 2026 Budget, described as a record investment. The FIPPA amendment was characterized as protecting Ontario from foreign entities.

08 · Provincial accountability mechanisms

Seven levers, every one exercisable under current law.

  1. 01

    Standing Committee on Public Accounts.

    Can request the AG to audit AccessOAP as a grant recipient. Precedent: opposition leaders jointly requested the Greenbelt audit in January 2023.
  2. 02

    AG public request form.

    The Auditor General considers public submissions when planning audits. Anonymous submissions accepted.
  3. 03

    Ontario Ombudsman — systemic investigation.

    Nowhere to Turn (2016) made 60 recommendations on developmental services. The Ombudsman has jurisdiction over MCCSS.
  4. 04

    FAO analysis request — any MPP.

    Any MPP can request the FAO to examine the cost-effectiveness of AccessOAP’s delegated delivery model.
  5. 05

    FIPPA request to MCCSS.

    MCCSS holds the AccessOAP contract, performance metrics, and financial reports. FOI the ministry for what it knows about how $57.9M is spent.
  6. 06

    IPC order.

    If MCCSS denies a FIPPA request for AccessOAP contract records, the Information and Privacy Commissioner can compel disclosure. IPC orders are binding.
  7. 07

    Federal AG “follow the money.”

    If National Autism Strategy funds flow to Ontario, the federal AG’s authority under the Federal Accountability Act (2006) engages automatically.

09 · Federal accountability mechanisms

Healthcare is provincial. Federal money comes with federal strings.

  1. 01

    Canada Health Act — sections 14, 15, 18–20.

    Allows the federal government to withhold CHT payments if provinces violate its five criteria. Ontario has never been penalized under the CHA for autism services, but the statutory authority exists.
  2. 02

    Canada Health Transfer — conditional funding.

    The CHT is not unconditional. The 2023 bilateral health agreements require provinces to report on how funds are used. Federal transfers have been withheld before.
  3. 03

    Canada Social Transfer — section 24.3.

    The CST funds social programs including early-childhood development. A National Autism Strategy could establish shared principles and objectives.
  4. 04

    Bill S-203 / National Autism Strategy.

    The Strategy Secretariat sits within PHAC. Federal autism funding comes with strings, reporting requirements, and the federal AG’s follow-the-money authority.
  5. 05

    Federal spending power.

    The constitutional spending power allows Ottawa to attach conditions to any transfer, even in provincial jurisdiction. A National Autism Strategy with conditional funding would use this mechanism.

Scope

The CHA covers insured health services — primarily medically necessary physician and hospital services. Autism therapy delivered through a dedicated provincial program is not clearly within the CHA’s current envelope. However, the April 2026 CHA Services Policy expansion creates a precedent for broadening that definition.

10 · Structural reforms

The oversight gap is a design choice. Other designs are possible.

  1. 01

    FIPPA designation for major contractors.

    Designate entities administering $10M+ in public funds as FIPPA institutions through regulation. AccessOAP’s records become accessible.
  2. 02

    Mandatory AG audit cycle.

    Require the AG to include grant recipients above $25M in the regular audit cycle. Systematic, not discretionary.
  3. 03

    Public reporting in transfer payments.

    Require detailed public financial breakdowns — by function and by partner — in all transfer payment agreements above $10M.
  4. 04

    Outcome reporting tied to funding.

    Measure developmental milestones, therapy hours delivered, wait-time reduction, and family satisfaction — not just enrollment numbers.
  5. 05

    Independent evaluation.

    Periodic arm’s-length evaluation reporting to the Legislature. The FAO or a dedicated unit could fulfil this role.
  6. 06

    Whistleblower protections.

    Extend Public Service of Ontario Act protections to employees of grant recipients performing public functions.

Right now

The oversight gap exists by design. So does the fix.

We are calling for mandatory independent audits of all major OAP contractors and direct public FIPPA access for publicly funded institutions. Two minutes. We pre-fill the verified numbers.

Write your MPPSee all actions

Verified anchors

$691.2M OAP spending 2023–24 · FAO/FOI
44.5% reaches core clinical therapy · Trillium FOI
$57.9M to AccessOAP · FAO
88,175 registered / 20,666 funded · CBC FOI Jan 2026

Reading list

  • The Corporate Takeover Playbook
  • The Quiet Transfer
  • Privatization Dangers
  • 74 Pages, 65% Undocumented

Editorial note

Scope and fairness: this page describes a structural pattern. It does not characterize the intent, competence, or integrity of AccessOAP, Accerta Services, or any consortium partner. No allegation of wrongdoing is made or implied anywhere on this page. Fair comment under Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, and WIC Radio Ltd. v. Simpson, 2008 SCC 40.

About This Article
Written by:Spencer Carroll - Founder & Autism AdvocateParent of autistic child navigating OAP system
Featured in CBC News Investigation
FOI Data Verified
Clip in WHO Social Media Reel
Active HRTO Advocacy
FAO & Legislative Assembly Cited

Where do you start?

Choose your path

The quickest routes to diagnosis guidance, evidence, practical support, and advocacy.

Just diagnosed?
First steps after an autism diagnosis
Already waiting?
What to do while on the waitlist
See the data
FOI-backed charts, methods, and evidence
Want change?
Write your MPP in 5 minutes

Verified Facts

Facts cited on this page

88,175 — children are registered in the Ontario Autism Program

SecondaryCBC FOI Jan 2026Verified: 2026-04-29

23.4% — Only 20,666 children have active funding agreements () — less than one in four

SecondaryCBC FOI Jan 2026Verified: 2026-04-29

WHO recommends accessible, community-based early interventions for children with autism — timely evidence-based psychosocial interventions improve communication and social engagement

Gov / Peer-ReviewedWorld Health Organization (2023)Verified: 2023-11-15
View our methodologyView all sourcesNext data update: 2026-05-15