Loading page...
Ontario schools can use physical restraint and seclusion rooms — and most parents don't find out until after it has already happened. Here is what the law says, what your rights are, and what to do if your autistic child is being restrained.
Physical restraint includes any use of physical force to hold, block, or restrict a student's movement — including holding a student's arms, pinning them to the ground, or blocking a doorway to prevent exit.
Mechanical restraint means the use of straps, harnesses, or other devices to restrict movement. This is extremely rare in Ontario schools and should trigger immediate escalation if encountered.
Chemical restraint — the use of medication to control behaviour rather than to treat a medical condition — is also extremely rare in school settings but is a form of restraint if used for behavioural management purposes.
Seclusion means placing a student alone in a room or space that they cannot freely leave. It does not matter what the room is called — "calm room," "quiet room," or "chill space" — if the student cannot exit on their own, it is seclusion.
Rooms that lock from the outside, or that are staffed specifically to prevent the student from leaving, qualify as seclusion regardless of labelling.
Not seclusion: A student choosing to take a voluntary break in a sensory room or quiet space that they can freely leave at any time, with staff nearby but not blocking exit.
No specific section governs restraint or seclusion. Section 265(1)(a) gives principals a duty to maintain order and safety — schools sometimes cite this to justify restraint, but it does not authorize indiscriminate use.
The Act requires IEPs for students with special education needs (Reg. 181/98) and IPRC processes for identification and placement.
The Ontario Human Rights Code prohibits disability-based discrimination in services and education. Schools have a duty to accommodate students with disabilities to the point of undue hardship.
Disproportionate or routine use of restraint on autistic students — when appropriate accommodation or a positive behaviour support plan would reduce the need — may constitute discrimination under the Code.
Policy/Program Memorandum 145 requires every school board to have a progressive discipline policy. It emphasizes preventive and supportive approaches, but does not explicitly define or regulate the use of physical restraint or seclusion.
Most Ontario school boards have their own restraint and seclusion policies with varying levels of protection. Request your board's policy in writing.
The absence of provincial legislation is a significant gap. Ontario is one of the few Canadian provinces without legislation specifically governing restraint and seclusion in schools. This leaves families dependent on individual school board policies that vary widely in quality and enforcement.
You must be notified every time restraint or seclusion is used on your child. If you are not being called after incidents, this is itself a violation of board policy.
You can request and receive written records of every incident, including date, time, duration, staff involved, and what triggered the intervention.
You can request a meeting at any time to review the behaviour safety plan within your child's IEP. This right does not require a specific number of incidents to trigger.
You can request that specific interventions — including physical restraint — be listed as prohibited in your child's IEP. Once documented in the IEP, the school is bound by that agreement.
You can file a complaint with the school board, the Ontario Ombudsman, or the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) if your rights are not being respected.
Follow these steps in order. Document everything in writing. Every communication with the school should be followed up by email so there is a paper trail.
Ask for the date, time, duration, staff involved, what triggered the incident, and what was done before restraint was attempted. Keep copies of everything.
Contact the principal and vice-principal in writing. State that you are requesting an urgent IEP review due to the use of physical restraint.
If no FBA has been completed, request one in writing. An FBA identifies triggers and patterns and must precede any positive behaviour support plan.
The behaviour safety plan should prioritize de-escalation strategies, environmental modifications, and preventive supports — not reactive physical intervention.
Follow up every verbal conversation with an email summarizing what was said and agreed. Send to the principal and copy the superintendent. Keep all records.
Escalation order: principal → superintendent → SEAC → formal school board complaint → Ontario Ombudsman → HRTO human rights complaint.
These are warning signs that restraint or seclusion is being misused. If you recognize any of these, treat them as urgent and begin documenting immediately.
Free legal advice and representation for people with disabilities in Ontario. Handles education law, HRTO applications, and school board disputes.
Visit ARCHFile a formal complaint about disability-based discrimination in education. The OHRC also publishes policy guidance on education rights.
Visit OHRCAdvocacy support for people with intellectual disabilities across Ontario, including school-related advocacy and systemic change work.
Visit Community LivingThis page is part of the Education & Schools topic cluster. School rights, IEPs, IPRC, and advocacy for autistic students in Ontario.
Take Action
Join thousands of Ontario families advocating for timely autism services.
Commitment to Accuracy: Our data is independently verified against official government reports (FAO, MCCSS), peer-reviewed scientific literature, and accessible public records. Last updated: February 1, 2026.
Stay Updated
One concise email per month with FOI updates, policy changes, and practical next steps.